How Hot Is It In Hell?

Written by John Borst on June 30, 2007 – 6:34 pm

posted by John Borst

The following story has migrated through a variety of listserves and discussion groups. You have to admit it was one hell’ve an assignment. Besides, it’s a long-weekend and we all need something lite.

How Hot Is It In Hell? (A True Story from a Yale professor)

A thermodynamics professor had written a take home exam for his graduate students. It had one question: “Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)? Support your answer with a proof.”

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law (gas cools off when it expands and heats up when it is compressed) or some variant.

One student, however, wrote the following: “First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So, we need to know the rate that souls are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell.

Since there are more than one of these religions and since most people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially.

Second, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand as souls are added. This gives two possibilities:

1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.

2. Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.

So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Miss Theresa Banyan during my freshman year that, “It will be a cold night in Hell before I sleep with you,” and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded with her, then #2 cannot be true, and so Hell is exothermic.”

The student got the only (you can place in the appropriate mark!)

Posted under blogToTrust | Comments Off

Young Catholics not married to old ideas

Written by John Borst on June 30, 2007 – 3:49 am

posted by John Borst

The following is from an insert box to an article “A betrothal proposal” by Michael J. Lawler and Gail S. Risch in the July issue of U.S. Catholic Magazine.

I doubt there is much new information in this list that an experienced high school Religious Education teacher doesn’t already know from anecdotal experience.

Young adult Catholics have decidedly different views about marriage from those of previous generations. Among the surprising opinions they tell focus group researchers:

• Many participants affirm marriage as an important goal but say they do not know what the church teaches about it.

• They cite confusion about church teaching because church leaders send mixed messages about sex, contraception, and divorce/annulment.

• Some disagree with church teaching on premarital sex and cohabitation.

• They do not see a difference between a loving relationship before and after a wedding.

• The most common area of disagreement with church teaching is contraception.

• Marriage preparation should begin earlier than just before the wedding, optimally in the family, certainly in high school.

• Young couples should be matched with older married couples to mentor them before and after their wedding.

• A majority do not see parishes as helpful to them before or after their wedding.

—MGL and GSR

Posted under blogToTrust | Comments Off

Alberta Catholic Schools…A Social History

Written by John Borst on June 30, 2007 – 3:04 am

Posted by John Borst

The following Eric item appeared on Google Alert Catholic Schools Alberta. Those interested in the history of Catholic schools in Canada might find this reference of interest.

ED243200 – Alberta Catholic Schools…A Social History.

ERIC #:ED243200

Title: Alberta Catholic Schools…A Social History.

Authors: Tkach, Nicholas

Descriptors: Catholic Educators; Catholic Schools; Curriculum; Educational History; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; Nuns; Priests; Private Education; Public Schools; Religious Education; Social History; Social Influences; Sociocultural Patterns; Socioeconomic Influences; Values

Source: N/A

Peer-Reviewed: N/A

Publisher: Publication Services, 4-116 Education North, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G5 Canada ($12.50 Canadian; quantity discounts).

Publication Date:1983-00-00

Pages: 397

Pub Types: Books; Historical Materials

Abstract:

The purposes of this book are to trace the influence of major social forces on the Alberta, Canada, public and Catholic school systems and to detail the evolution of these two systems. Beginning with a review of “The First People” of the Northwest Territories, chapter I examines political, economic, and sociocultural developments and their impact on education up to 1905; chapters II and III profile, respectively, the most prominent missionaries and the two principal orders of nuns active in the area during this early period. In chapter IV, the author traces the impact of social forces on education from 1905 to 1912. Following chapter V’s exposition of major social forces in Alberta from 1912 to 1936, chapter VI details the impact of these developments on public and Catholic education during the same period. Chapter VII covers sociocultural factors and their implications for the period extending from 1936 to 1957. After a discussion in chapter VIII of the Alberta Catholic Education Association. chapter IX focuses on the period from 1957 to 1971 and its curriculum shift to “values education.” The final chapter’s description of the Alberta Catholic School Trustees’ Association extends the study beyond 1971. The book concludes with an epilogue and a set of references. (JBM)

Abstractor: N/A

Reference Count: N/A


Note:N/A

Identifiers: Alberta; Alberta Catholic Education Association; Alberta Catholic School Trustees Association; Canada

Record Type: Non-Journal

Level:2 – Full text not available online in ERIC; access through the ERIC microfiche collection Institutions: Alberta Univ., Edmonton. Faculty of Education.

Sponsors: N/A

ISBN: ISBN-0-88864-944-4

ISSN: N/A

Audiences: N/A

Languages: English

Education Level: N/A

Posted under blogToTrust | Comments Off

A summer trip with destiny: An autobiographical moment

Written by John Borst on June 29, 2007 – 7:45 pm

by John Borst

Editor’s note: this piece properly belongs in the blogToTrust category but as my son tells me it is sometimes hard to determine where the line is drawn, so with an editor’s privilege, I am placing it in the features column.

Now that the “summer holiday” period for teachers has begun, I am inspired to share a brief comment on the first “summer” I took off from teaching.

I began teaching in September 1960, after high school and one year of “Teacher’s College.” I immediately enrolled as an extension student at McMaster University and so my first five summers were spend on campus studying. By ’66, I had my BA with a history major.

The summer of 1966 was also the year my sister was to get married in Vancouver B.C., so my wife and I decided we would camp our way across Canada. The day of destiny turned out to be the third day of the trip.

The second evening we camped at Rainbow Provincial Campground on the TransCanada Highway just west of Schreiber, Ontario. For some reason or other we decided the footwear I had was insufficient for the rigours of camping so while visiting Thunder Bay, Ontario I purchased a pair of work boots at the Army and Navy Surplus store located near the corner of Miles and Memorial Avenue, cost $13.60.

Then after visiting my wife’s uncle, a teacher of Art at Fort William Collegiate, we proceeded to Aaron Provincial Park about 16 kilometres east of Dryden, Ontario.

Little did I know that those two locations Thunder Bay and Dryden, especially both the corner of Miles and Memorial and Aaron Provincial Park would become part of my life decades later.

Ten and a half years after that first visit to what was then the twin cities of Port Arthur and Fort William, I took a job as a curriculum coordinator (Social and Environmental Studies) with the Lakehead District Roman Catholic Separate School Board. And where was Lakehead Catholic’s board office? None other than “near the corner of Miles and Memorial.” While the Army and Navy store was on Memorial Ave., the Board’s office was on Miles Street. But that’s not the end of the coincidence in Thunder Bay.

After a number of attempts, my wife and I, now with three children, were unable to come to terms over the purchase of a house so we purchased a piece of property and I took my second summer off; this time to build a house. I had continued my studies, first to get an Honours equivalent degree in Geography, then a secondary school teaching certificate followed by a Master of Education at O.I.S.E .

In what was now the summer of 1977, I built a house as contractor and chief joe-job-guy and totally wore out those boots, which in October of that year went in the waste bucket. As a small aside my oldest son is a graduate of Fort William Collegiate, it being pre-extension (of Catholic funding to the end of high school) days when he began.

Almost another decade later, I took a secondment as principal of St. John’s elementary school with the Red Lake Area Combined Roman Catholic Separate School Board, now a “School Authority”, meaning it was never amalgamated with any board in 1998. The community and school were over 650 kilometres from my home in Thunder Bay. A trip I was to make all but two weekends during the 1984-85 school year. On those other two weekends, my family came to see me in Red Lake and on the other one, I flew.

Of course driving Highways 17 and 105 took me past Aaron Provincial Park and beautiful Thunder Lake upon which it is located as well as through the Town of Dryden, where I always stopped at either the A&W or McDonalds for a quick burger and fries.

In the summer of 1987, I moved back to York Region and a job as a superintendent with the York Region Roman Catholic Separate School Board. Then in January of 1993, I accepted a position as the Director of Education with the Dryden Board of Education with head offices in Dryden of course. And where did I buy a house? That’s right, 15 kilometres east of town, almost directly across from Aaron Provincial Park only on Lake Wabigoon. In fact as I turn south to the lake, I straddle the park’s south-western boundary.

It took 27 years for the destiny of that July 20, 1966 day to be fully realised but here I am 41 years later, still living it.

As an addendum, here are some examples of the cost of that trip in 1996 dollars:

    • Lunch for two in Sudbury, $1.58;
    • Supper for two at Harmony Beach, $2.94
    • 4 post cards, 20cents
    • Butter, 40 cents
    • 2 cokes, 30 cents
    • 1 night camping, 50 cents
    • Motel for 3 nights in North Vancouver $34.50
    • Female hair styled for wedding $3.00
    • Film $7.15
    • Total kilometers traveled 11,742; total cost of gas $136.51

©Tomorrow’s Trust 2007

Posted under Commentary | 1 Comment »

MySpace v. Facebook: Which Students Choose Which?

Written by John Borst on June 29, 2007 – 5:18 pm

posted by John Borst

A report in the Windsor Star, June 29, 2007 by Misty Harris begins:

Choosing a social networking site is beginning to resemble finding the “right” table in the school cafeteria.

According to University of California ethnographer, danah boyd, adherents of rival sites Facebook and MySpace are lining up on opposite sides of a class divide, with “the goodie-two-shoes, jocks, athletes, or other ‘good’ kids” going to the former and “punks, emos, Goths, gangstas, queer kids and other kids who (don’t) fit into the dominant high-school popularity paradigm” aligning themselves with the latter.

danah boyd’s study looks like it would be worth a closer look.

Posted under blogToTrust | Comments Off

Scant Protest to Museum of the History of Polish Jews

Written by John Borst on June 28, 2007 – 11:17 pm

posted by John Borst

Even in the ‘Digital Age’ museums have a place in the education of society. There is something special about being able to reach out and touch something real or to be immersed in a sense of history. It is something the digital age, even when it becomes three dimensional will never be able to duplicate.

The June 26, 2007 issue of The Jewish Daily Forward has an article by Oren Rawls titled “Polish Museum Draws Scant Protest” announcing:

On Tuesday, a “Who’s Who” of American Jewish philanthropists joined Polish President Lech Kaczynski in Warsaw to break ground on the Museum of the History of Polish Jews, an institution being billed as a foundation on which to rebuild understanding between Poles and Jews.

As we all know that could also have read “between Catholics and Jews”.

Rawls goes on:

The scene would have been hard to imagine just a generation ago, when Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir famously quipped that Poles sucked anti-Semitism in with their mothers’ milk. Indeed, the convergence of Polish and Jewish support for a museum dedicated to Polish Jewish history — built in large part with public Polish funds, no less, on the former site of the Warsaw Ghetto — has drawn remarkably little protest from two peoples long distrustful of each other.

Link here for the rest of this remarkable story of cooperation and why and how it is happening now.

Posted under blogToTrust | Comments Off

Retired teacher decries OCT in Ombudsman’s NO-GO Zone

Written by John Borst on June 28, 2007 – 7:13 pm

posted by John Borst

In a post to Tomorrow’s Trust, retired teacher, and former member of the Ontario College of Teachers’ Board of Governors, James A. Black claims that the College needs to come under the Ombudsman’s review.

June 27, 2007

by Jim Black

Re: Ont. government’s ‘puffery’ undermines public confidence: ombudsman

The Ombudsmen office is saying nothing new. Over 94 percent of the teachers in the province spoke up against the government imposed agency, the Ontario College of Teachers, by refusing on mass not to vote in the Colleges last election. I can’t speak for the 220,000 teachers in Ontario but I do know what happened behind closed doors.

How could a government controlled agency such as the Ontario College of Teachers claim to represent the public interest when they allow convicted sex offenders back in the teaching profession while ignoring victims of these very same teachers. We are not talking about silly games; we are talking about sexual intercourse with kids.

On the race issue in the province, the Ontario College of teachers allows Native Language instructors to be paid less than English, French and Latin teachers. Is there something wrong here?

Teachers are forced to retire or resign their teaching positions before they can speak up against these terrible abuses of power. The so called professional organization is controlled by the government as less than five full time teachers have ever sat on the College governing council at any one time.

When I sat on the Council, I was the only full time teacher not endorsed by the Ontario Teachers’ Unions. The Ombudsman has sugar coated the outrageous administrative abuse I witnessed.

I can only hope this report is just the beginning,.

Posted under blogToTrust | Comments Off

Shaking White & Black Australia Awake

Written by John Borst on June 28, 2007 – 3:41 am

posted by John Borst

As a resident of Northwestern Ontario, where, within a few years our Nishnawbe Aski people will be the majority population, the issue of aboriginal education is never far from the table in either Public or Catholic schools.

As a Canadian, I have often wondered how Australia’s aboriginal population has fared in comparison to our own troubled history.

One of the few clues has come from reading the novel The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith by Catholic writer Thomas Keneally. (of Schindler’s List fame)

Today, however there is an extraordinary report in The Guardian by another Australian novelist Richard Flanagan (most recent book The Unknown Terrorist)

Here are some small excerpts:

Under Howard, federal government support for black Australia slowly dried up. Services were slashed, native title restricted. By 2000 official figures revealed that more than 41% of indigenous women and 50% of indigenous men could expect to die before they reached 50. Still nothing was done. The condition of many Aboriginal communities – frequently and accurately described as third world – grew only worse.

Snip

The immediate catalyst was a Northern Territory government report into child sexual abuse in Aboriginal communities. It presented a horrifying picture of black Australia in collapse, ridden by violence, despair, pornography, drugs, gambling and sexual abuse, all fuelled by “rivers of grog”.

Howard’s response – a five-year takeover of 60 indigenous communities, with soldiers and police overseeing alcohol and pornography bans, the part-quarantining of welfare payments to parents to ensure money is spent on food and other necessities, and the compulsory testing of Aboriginal children for sexual abuse.

Snip

It took many back to the horror of the infamous “stolen generation”, thousands of Aboriginal children taken, often forcibly, from their families into institutions in a misguided attempt at assimilation through the 20th century.

The full 1055 word essay is linked at the word “report” above.

Posted under blogToTrust | Comments Off

To Pass or Fail, that is the question! Or is it?

Written by John Borst on June 28, 2007 – 1:17 am

by John Borst

Shakespeare may have coined “To be, or not to be; that is the question!” but for educators the modern equivalent is ‘To pass or not-to-pass; that is the question.’ Actually, I do not think that is the real question either. The real issue for both teachers and society is being immersed in the hypocrisy of it all.

Since this is June, the annual ritual angst of passing and failing students provides newspapers and letter writers alike an opportunity to expound on one or more, or perhaps all, of the following: the declining lack of standards, the molly coddling of today’s youth or the lack of preparation for the toughness of the work world.

The second week of June 2007, saw a flurry of articles and letters kicked off by The Globe and Mail articles of Jill Mahoney and John Lorinc on the evils of “social promotion” and fuzzy deadlines, followed by Louis Brown at The Star (”Failure is not an option; age of entitlement”) and capped by off by Claire Hoy at the Sudbury Star declaring “System fails students” by “setting them up for a big fall as adults.”

Numerous letter writers responded, many of them disgruntled teachers feeling betrayed and undermined by Ministry or Board student evaluation and/or reporting policy changes.

I have come to the conclusion that all societies are fundamentally divided into two camps, those who possess an authoritarian bent and believe that change can be fostered through law enforcement and those of a less authoritarian bent who believe persuasion through education is more productive. The issue of what to do with a student, who doesn’t achieve at a rate commensurate with the majority of his peers, falls somewhere along this line.

Strict standards, with a numerical cut off provide a quasi-scientific justification for deciding a child has not mastered sufficient material to move to the next Grade is consistent with a legalistic approach to education. On the other hand recognition that everyone learns differently and at different rates causes other teachers to move children through a learning process that respects this difference. In education, philosophically, this is called the “progressive” movement.

Years of research and simple anecdotal evidence repeatedly demonstrate that the “failure” route simply does not lead to success. The alternative is to attempt to provide additional support for those students who for a wide variety of reasons cannot or have not kept up with their peers.

As a former administrator steeped in research and of a progressive bent, I am still amazed that there are teachers who want to apply the rules only approach to students, especially those in the elementary grades. I say this because when the shoe falls upon them as teachers, when they face their own evaluation as teachers, they want all of the benefits of the progressive approach to employment evaluation or should I say growth as a teacher.

In all cases teachers expect, and teacher unions everywhere, have negotiated a progressive dismissal process. Administrators must provide teachers with extra support to improve their teacher practice, usually over a considerable length of time, often with numerous changes, before dismissal for incompetence can occur. Once the process is complete “failure” can be agreed upon by all parties, the teacher, the union and the administrator.

As we all know many administrators would like to have the same authority to dismiss a teacher as a teacher has to dismiss, meaning fail, a student. The bottom line is they don’t. Thus the hypocrisy of teachers arguing for more failures as a means to improve education becomes apparent.

Provincial standards of dismissal require “constructive discipline” procedures be followed. Suspensions in employment law are like suspensions in school law. Dismissal with cause, used rarely, is equivalent to “expulsion” provisions in education law.

Hoy is simply wrong. In school interrelated promotion and discipline policies already mirror the so called tough world of work. Brown claims students live in a world of “entitlement”; well so do parents and all employees. Mahoney and Lorinc bemoan the “social promotion” canard, yet fail to recognize this too is embedded into the teachers own employment contracts.

When teachers move through grid levels and years of service increases they too are experiencing a form of social promotion, something I am sure not one of them would want to forfeit. As an aside, I am not proposing the elimination of such a system. In my experience, it has proven to be a highly motivating force for self improvement, particularly the grid levels. Call it the equivalent of corporations paying for staff upgrading as in an MBA. But again, the double standard between what some in society expects for its members and proposes for students becomes apparent.

Isn’t it about time the hypocrisy of this ritualistic flagellation of education over promotion policy came to an end? Don’t, however, hold your breath.

© copyright Tomorrow’s Trust 2007

Posted under Commentary | Comments Off

Britain’s New Prime Minister’s Vision on Education

Written by John Borst on June 27, 2007 – 6:15 pm

posted by John Borst

Today, Gordon Brown takes over as Prime Minister of Great Britain. On June 20, 2007, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, Brown gave a speech to the leaders of the City of London at Mansion House on his vision of education.

After a lengthy introduction on the city, the economy, and globalisation, he has this to say about education:

. . . . .

But most importantly of all in the new world order, as the City bears witness, Britain’s great natural resource are our people – resourceful, enterprising, innovative – the foundation on which we will compete successfully.

. . . . .

We are unquestionably an enormously talented and creative country. Historically, we’ve been one of the most inventive nations in the world. And as the City shows with its high skills, if we are to be what I want Britain to be – the great global success story of this century – our first priority, and this is the theme of my final speech to you as Chancellor, must be to use the talents of every individual in our country far better than we do today by ensuring we become world class in education.

But if we fail to equip people successfully for the future and then as a result of them being left behind by our competitors, they start to see themselves as the victims not beneficiaries of globalisation, I have no doubt that open markets, free trade and flexibility will be challenged by protectionist pressures.

Indeed this is what we are already seeing in the USA, parts of Europe and Asia.

So the choice is for me clear: invest in education, to prevent protectionism.

It is investment in education that when combined with free trade, open markets and flexibility makes for the virtuous circle of an inclusive globalisation:

  • the key to prosperity for all as well as to opportunity for all,
  • the key to making globalisation work, and
  • to become world class in education is our mission.

And so I believe it is time for all of us, and particularly businesses who recruit skilled people, to usher in a national debate on how we, Britain, can move to becoming world class in education.

But for me the necessity for this national debate is fundamental. Because unless we widely engage people in the debate about being world class in education – and show how people themselves must now be involved in an endeavour that is essential to secure our common future prosperity – then that future prosperity is at risk.

Let me give one example.

Today there are in Britain 5 million unskilled people. By 2020 we will need only just over half a million. So we must create up to five million new skilled jobs and to fill them we must persuade five million unskilled men and women to gain skills, the biggest transformation in the skills of our economy for more than a century.

And we will need 50 per cent more people of graduate skills. Yet, while China and India are turning out 4 million graduates a year, we produce just 400,000.

Quite simply in Britain today there is too much potential untapped, too much talent wasted, too much ability unrealised.

And so despite all the progress we have made, there is no place in the new Britain we seek for complacency and no room for inadequate skills, low aspirations, a soft approach to discipline or for a culture of the second best.

Other countries aren’t standing still, rather they are pushing forward the frontiers – showing what a 21st century education system can offer. There are many good examples:

  • in Finland every teacher now has a masters degree and many have PhDs,
  • in Ireland 55 per cent now go on to higher education and their target is for 90% to stay in education until 18,
  • in France every pupil now learns a second language in primary school, and
  • in Singapore the consistently high quality of classroom teaching has led them to be world leaders in maths and science.

The global competition to create highly skilled, value added economies is fierce and can only get fiercer.

I am passionate about education because I want a Britain where there is no cap on ambition, no ceiling on talent, no limit to where your potential will take you and how far you can rise. A Britain of talent unleashed, driving our economy and future prosperity.

And because schools are the foundation, we need to ensure all schools are committed to high standards and are at the same time centres of creativity, innovation and enjoyment. Ready to challenge and inspire – fostering scholarship, inquisitiveness and independence of thought, teaching facts and imparting knowledge – of course. But doing far more than that – nourishing all forms of talent – because that is the future of our nation.

The foundation of our new approach is that for the first time young people in Britain will be offered education to 18 and for the first time also a clear pathway from school to a career: either through college or university and then a profession, or through an apprenticeship and skilled work. Diplomas such as engineering or for others a young apprenticeship with an employer. For those who need more support we will provide pre-apprenticeship courses as a stepping stone to a full apprenticeship of which there will, over time, be 500,000.

And I believe that taking private and public investments together, advanced industrial countries will have in future aspire to invest not 5-6-7-8 per cent of their national income, on education science and innovation but 10 per cent, one pound in every ten.

And to mobilise all the energies of our country – the Secretary of State for Education and I propose a National Council for Educational Excellence – bringing together leaders in business, higher education, and the voluntary sector, alongside school heads, teachers and parents, all who can play their part.

It is good for our country that we have businesses involved in some schools, and I can congratulate companies who are. In future every single secondary school and primary school should have a business partner and I invite you all to participate, every secondary school should have a university or college partner, every school should work directly with the arts and cultural and sporting communities in their area, every school should work with other local schools to raise standards for all.

I am pleased that Sir Terry Leahy, Sir John Rose, Richard Lambert, Bob Wigley and Damon Buffini have agreed to join the Council.
The Council will be advised by Sir Michael Barber, Julia Cleverdon, Head of Business in the Community, has agreed to report on how more businesses, small medium and large, can play a bigger part in support of our schools.

We have asked Steve Smith, Vice-Chancellor of Exeter University to report on what more universities and colleges can do to help our schools.
We have asked Edward Gould, former chair of the Independent Schools Council and Steve Munday, Principal of Comberton Village College to work jointly to identify how in areas such as sports science and languages private and state funded schools can work together to raise standards to the benefit of all.

We would like this new Council to promote national debate, that I invite you to be part of, about our ambitions for our education system in the years to 2020: today we invest £5,500 in the education of a pupil in the public sector and £8,000 or more in the private sector, 50 per cent per pupil less, and my aim is, over time, to raise our public investment towards that £8,000 figure.

First, our future education policy must and will champion aspiration and excellence with a renewed focus on standards and rigour in teaching methods, particularly in literacy and by reviewing fundamentally the teaching of numeracy.

So my proposal is for a far-reaching new nationwide programme that will empower head teachers to provide individual guidance and support for every child in Britain:

  • for each pupil, a personal learning guide or coach to help them make the right curriculum choices and to act as an easy point of contact for parents,
  • to back this up, for pupils at risk of falling behind, early intervention and special support to help them catch up. This is already underway with the ‘Every Child a Reader’ programme for literacy, which is now being matched with the ‘Every Chid Counts’ initiative for numeracy, alongside one-to one tuition for up to another 600,000 children,
  • for all secondary school pupils, starting with a pilot this year, access to after-school small group tuition in subjects areas they have special interest in,
  • for pupils who show a special aptitude or talent, extra support through growing our gifted and talented programme,
  • for young people at risk of disillusion or dropping out, a mentor – often from a local business – to help them raise their sights, and
  • to ensure that those on low incomes receive the support they need, I would also like to pilot a new learning credit which they, their parents and the school can agree will be spent on extra provision in order to make the most of their potential.

And because this personalised approach to learning is at the heart of the next stage of education reform, we need a renewed focus on setting by ability in the key subjects essential to our competitiveness like maths, English, science and languages as the norm in all our schools; we need pupils increasingly assessed on these subjects by stage, when they are ready to move to the next level; and we need schools held to account for ensuring that every child makes progress.

Second, in order to achieve excellence in the classroom, future educational policy must and will champion greater diversity, the best way of both encouraging innovation and meeting the different and individual needs of every child. Already we are close to every school being either a specialist, trust or academy school – like the City of London’s own academy in Bermondsey I recently visited with Lord Adonis, and applaud and like so many is flourishing. And we will now consider reduced cash contributions for universities and colleges to make it easier for them to play a fuller part in the expansion of academies.

And we should also be willing to consider new proposals for: combined all-through primary and secondary schools, employer-led skills academies to transform the quality of vocational provision, and studio schools that motivate dis-engaged pupils by allowing them to learn the curriculum alongside a chance to work in and run a real business based in the school.

Third, future education policy must and will champion excellence in teaching. Excellent standards require excellent teachers and hence greater status and respect for the difficult job they do. So we need to give heads the freedom they need to lead schools and respect the professionalism of our teachers – helping them to train and retrain, and become expert tutors and subject specialists. We also need to attract more of the most inspirational graduates from the best universities into our schools. So we will expand our ‘Teach First’ programme for the best graduates and complement it with a new ‘Teach Next’ programme, encouraging men and women of talent to move mid or late career into teaching.

And fourth, future education policy will champion discipline. I know parents and employers expect us to do more to help schools recognise this vital role in developing children and young people and they are right to do so. I want teachers to be in control in every classroom, so we will work with the profession not just to ensure that teachers can make maximum use of tough new powers, but to emphasise the priority of setting boundaries on what is acceptable and unacceptable, I will ask Ofsted to consider raising the bar on what is satisfactory and unsatisfactory behaviour. And we will take further steps not just to stamp out bullying in and outside the school but give parents rights of appeal.

And alongside discipline there are broader educational goals that have had too little attention: good behaviour, decent manners, the ability to communicate well and work in a team – these soft skills that help a young person’s character develop, that are critical for their employability, and are the essential complement to the hard skills they gain from higher standards.

And we’ll do this by encouraging parents to work with schools and organisations in the community that have a reputation for fostering children’s character, like the cadets and skill-force; and by building a new offer of national youth community service for young people.

I have spoken about education this evening.

Only with investment in education can open markets, free trade and flexibility succeed.

And the prize is enormous. If we can show people that by equipping themselves for the future they can be the winners not losers in globalisation, beneficiaries of this era of fast moving change, then people will welcome open, flexible, free trade and pro-competition economies as an emancipating force.

If we can become the education nation, great days are ahead of us.

While never the biggest in size, nor the mightiest in military hardware, I believe we are – as the city’s success shows – capable of being one of the greatest success stories in the new global economy.

Already strong in this young century, but greater days are ahead of us.
Britain the education nation,
Britain a world leader for its talents and skills,
So tonight in celebrating the success of the talents, innovations and achievements of the city let us look forward to working together for even greater success in the future.

The full paper is available here.

Posted under News | Comments Off