by John Borst
The September 2007 issue of The Walrus has a very interesting article by novelist Jon Evans (Dark Places) titled “APOCALYPSE SOON: The future of reading”.
Essentially, Evans is not so much talking about the future of reading but the future of the publishing business and the novel in particular.
His contention or apocalypse is that he has seen the future in the form of the Sony Reader. He says “for the first time in my life I could envision myself abandoning paper for digital books. It was a revelation.”
Evans thinks that book publishers are hiding their head in the proverbial sand since the electronic book has been a “dismal failure” achieving only 0.2% of the market. He sees no reason why books will one day not go the way of the music recording industry, the newspaper and magazine industry and the movie industry.
The key to the Sony Reader is that you do not read it on an LCD screen but “electronic paper” and that in turn provides the same eye pleasing “contrast” as ink on paper.
Evans goes on to discuss the issue of “free content”, and why people will pay for something that is free and he uses iTunes as an example or in the case of books, purchasing a book at a book store when the same items is and has been “free” at the local library for the past hundred years.
Juxtaposed with this article is a recent piece in The New York Times about the cost of university text-books which reported that the average amount spent on texts per year is about $1000.00 Canadian. Examples of $200.00 textbooks in the maths and sciences were not hard to find. The author’s thesis is that new ways to price out text books need to be found.
I also remember with little fondness my own high school days when it was typical to carry your binder with six texts layered out three deep in two rows slung on your hip. I ‘m not sure when the backpack became the norm but certainly by 1990 woven-bags for girls and army surplus shoulder-bags were modish for guys, so the mid-nineties is a good estimate.
Imagine students carrying one small e-text reader about the size of a thin trade paperback upon which exists all of the student’s text books.
School boards annually spend hundreds of thousands and for boards like Toronto, millions of dollars on texts. Many are dated by the time they are in print. Many teacher’s would prefer new more up-to-date texts but have to make do with old ones until the old ones are no longer viable. Novels can’t be changed because there is no budget to purchase new ones.
Imagine if instead, a literature teacher got to choose the novels to be used on a yearly basis. Or the mathematics teacher could choose the most up-to-date text with the latest theorems explored. Or the geography teacher could choose a Wikitext that was annually updated with the latest demographic or economic data for a country under study.
Instead of outright purchases school boards would pay an annual licensing fee. In turn publishers would guarantee to update their texts continuously something akin to a professionally produced Wikipedia.
Such texts of course would be searchable, highlightable, and annotatable. The mathematics texts could provide edited text guiding students through each step of an equation. Videos, pictures, text messaging and chat features could no doubt be merged into an iText.
Just imagine if a literature teacher in a Catholic school wished to teach a course on the Catholic novel. With a downloadable bank of the entire works of the likes of Jon Hassler, William Kennedy, Thomas Keneally, Shuskau Endo, Mary Gordon, Brian Moore, Flannery O’Connor and Andre Dubus at his figure tips the flexibility to design a unique course of study would be liberating.
Imagine if instead of a small library of picture books in the corner of a Kindergarten classroom if each child had a large library of picture books on his own iBook or iTome as Jon Evans calls them. Primary teachers could truly customize a whole library of “I can read” books for the exact level through which a child is progressing. Young children could finally, read books in the same manner as do adult readers regardless of income disparities. Education would become even more of an egalitarian activity.
Evans concludes his piece with “the oncoming digital meteor will hit today’s publishing industry hard, and its dinosaurs are going to die.” Evans was talking about the publishers of novels. Text book publishers will not be immune from this revolution. Nor for that matter will the developers of curriculum or programs of study from the Ministry of Education to the department head in a high school or to the teacher in her classroom.
Anyone familiar with the history of education knows that we have swung from liberal progressive teacher-centred eras to the centralizing and standardizing forces of conservative bureaucratic-centred eras. The latter is getting a little long in the tooth. I suspect the dawn of the iText will see at least for a time the return of the next progressive era in education.
© copyright Tomorrow’s Trust, 2007